To provide a balanced and objective method of grading artistic and practical skills as applied to a realized production.
Activity Objectives
At the end of the course, the student will be able to:
- Develop and create designs through collaboration on a realized production.
- Demonstrate professional, courteous, and prompt communication in both verbal and visual methods.
- Demonstrate an attention to detail and accuracy for a realized project.
- Evaluate design project recommend distribution of available labor and materials to complete the realized project.
- Synthesize information and adapt to changes necessary to the realized project.
Rubric Goals
This rubric was designed to evaluate and encourage:
- Self-assessment of process and product
- Budgeting of resources (time, money, labor)
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Process 25% |
Process |
Produced insufficient work in all the following areas: required revisions, congenial attitude, work ethic, and/or daily/weekly communication with director/supervisor/mentor | Process lacked significantly in more than one of the following areas: required revisions, congenial attitude, excellent work ethic, and/or daily/weekly communication with director/supervisor/mentor | Process lacked in more than one of the following areas & lacked significantly in one area: required revisions, congenial attitude, excellent work ethic, and/or daily/weekly communication with director/supervisor/mentor | Expected process for a young designer with required revisions, congenial attitude, excellent work ethic, and/or daily/weekly communication with director/supervisor/mentor | Great process with revisions, congenial attitude, excellent work ethic, and daily/weekly communication with director/supervisor/mentor |
Communication |
Lack of communication with design team, director,supervisor, and mentor through individiual meetings, group meetings, emails, OR conversations with lack of timeliness in responses or follow-through. | Sparse communication with design team, director,supervisor, and mentor through individiual meetings, group meetings, emails, OR conversations with lack of timeliness in responses or follow-through. | In weekly communication with design team, director,supervisor, and mentor through individiual meetings, group meetings, emails, OR conversations. | In weekly communication with design team, director,supervisor, and mentor through individiual meetings, group meetings, emails, and conversations. | In constant communication with design team, director,supervisor, and mentor through individiual meetings, group meetings, emails, and conversations. | |
Accuracy and Presentation |
Partially accurate information relayed to some. Unacceptable verbal and/or visual presentation of work to others. | Either partially accurate information relayed to all OR Acceptable verbal OR visual presentation of work to others. | Partially accurate information relayed to all. Acceptable verbal and visual presentation of work to others. | Mostly accurate information relayed to all. Excellent verbal and visual presentation of work to others. | Extremely accurate information relayed to all. Excellent verbal and visual presentation of work to others. | |
Deadlines |
Did not the designated deadlines for the project. | Met the designated deadlines for some aspects of the project. | Met the designated deadlines for most aspects of the project. | Met the designated deadlines for all aspects of the project. | Met or exceeded the designated deadlines for all aspects of the project. | |
Production Process Journal/Sketch book |
Nothing submitted | Disorganized or minimally documented journal & sketch book submitted | Organized Production Journal and sketch book submitted. | |||
0 |
21 |
24 |
27 |
30 |
||
30% |
Production Binder (script, renderings, research, etc.) |
Nothing submitted | Missing 4-5 documents | Missing 2-3 documents or submitted late. | Missing 1-2 documents, submitted on time | All renderings, models, light plots, paperwork, drafting, etc. submitted on time. |
|
|
0 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
10% |
Budget of Resources |
Nothing submitted | Submitted the minimum amount of information | Submitted all information necessary for the show | ||
0 |
23 |
25 |
||||
25% |
Post Show Self Assessment |
Did not complete | Post show crtical analysis completed either orally or written with faculty advisor | Post show intensive crtical analysis completed either orally or written with faculty advisor | ||
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
10% |
Personal Growth |
No Growth | Minimal Growth | Expected Growth | Outstanding Growth | Exceptional Personal Growth |
Creative Product |
Complete process lacked a cohesive quality. | Parts of the project lacked cohesiveness. | Coherent design/project. | Coherent design/project executed with flair or creativity. | Excellent coherent design/project executed with flair and creativity. | |
| Total | ||||||
Submitted by
Tammy Honesty, Kent State University